Distribution expenses & Cost of goods sold
Good day to everyone! Please, help me in the next controversial question.
IAS 2 requires distribution expenses to be accounted as expenses of a period instead of to increase cost of goods. It is quite obvious, however, if, for instance, a company incurs transport expenses to deliver its products to customers situated in other regions or even in other countries. In this case, in my opinion it would be wrong to reflect this transport expenses as “distribution cost” of a period for the following reasons. Firstly, the moment of completion of a deal and corresponding revenue recognition can differ from the moment of transport expenses recognition. It leads to the breach of ”Accrual method” and IAS 18. Second of all, the sum of such expenses enhances Income (revenue) of the seller and in the same time is not included in cost of good sold. Eventually, “swollen” trade margin confuses users of financial statements especially if the company has not made such kind of sales to other regions earlier.
What do you think about this issue?
Personally, I tend to capitalize such transport expenses and write off them only after the fact of a sale.
Best wishes,
Dmitriy.
Related Posts
- Bond issue related cost
- Conversion of foreign currency expenses with local currency
- Capitalization expenses IFRS
- Unallocated revenue expenses
- Capitalization of repairment expenses
- Unallocated revenues expenses
- Preliminery expenses
- PRIOR YEARS’ EXPENSES
- Fixed vs Variable Wage Expense
- CAPITALISING EXPENSES























[New Post] Distribution expenses & Cost of goods sold – http://www.ifrslist.com/2010/04/distribu...
via Twitoaster
[New Post] Distribution expenses & Cost of goods sold – http://www.ifrslist.com/2010/04/distribu...
via Twitoaster
[...] DBusiness wrote an interesting post today. Here’s a quick excerptWelcome to IFRSLIST.com, the free community where you can find resources, share experience, knowledge and ideas about IFRS, bAccounting/b and Auditing with more than 1.5k members. Sign-up and start a new discussion. … [...]
I know where you are coming from but the main point I think is that the distribution expenses don’t meet the concept of assets at the time they’re capitalized…true, writing them off as incurred may not help to present gross margin but I think you’d just have to explain that in the MD&A or elsewhere. Basically, it’s difficult to use the “accrual method” as a justification for much, if the basic asset/liability concepts aren’t met…
My opinion is that distribution cost relates to selling out your goods & if it requires substantial time for transportation the basis of recognizing sales does not change.We recognizes sales on the basis of risk & rewards relating to ownership. If those conditions under IAS 18 are met then we recognized sales & accrued its related expenses.
Leave your response!
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Welcome
IFRS Courses around the world
Recent Member
May 21, 2012
May 17, 2012
May 11, 2012
May 9, 2012
May 4, 2012
May 4, 2012
May 1, 2012
April 30, 2012
April 27, 2012
April 27, 2012
April 25, 2012
April 24, 2012
Recent Comments
Tags
Greetings
Categories
Contributors
Help Keep IFRSLIST FREE
IFRS COURSES
IFRS RESOURCES
Who am I
Archives
Useful Links
Translator
Recent Posts
Most Commented
Most Viewed